____________________________________
Why I Am Sending
Coathangers to South Dakota Legislators
The
State of South Dakota has outlawed abortion under any circumstances,
save
the imminent death of a
woman. Raped? Too bad. By your father? Sorry sister. A
fetal abnormality that would lead to a short, miserable life
of terrible suffering? Break out the cigars!
Think
this is just about South Dakota? Think again. Not surprisingly, Missisippi
and Tennessee immediately followed suit, but the real threat is the
purposeful crafting of this law for appeal to the U.S. Supreme
Court in order to overturn Roe v. Wade. This is a direct
assault on the rights of every female in the United States of America.
The
issue is not whether a woman with an unwanted,
crisis pregnancy will end it, but how. History
proves beyond any doubt that
a woman in
such circumstances will attempt
to terminate the pregnancy - by any means, and often at
grave risk to her own life, health and safety. Why would she
risk so much? Because she is abolutely certain that continuing this
pregnancy is the wrong thing to do. She is
the only person on the planet who is in any position to make that determination
-not you or me, or the South Dakota legislature, or theocrats on the
Supreme Court.
Culture
of life? Please. By outlawing safe, legal
abortion, South Dakota
condemns
every women to
the dark
ages of unscrupulous, unlicensed and unsanitary abortionists, with
all of the
needless suffering and death that will certainly follow, as sure as
night follows day.
A
woman must have the right to make such a decision based on
her own moral reasoning. It's called freedom,
and I thought that was what this country stood for, what so many have
died
and sacrficed for. Don't want an abortion? Don't have one. See how freedom works?
(Not like, say, China.)
Make
no mistake: South Dakota has declared that every
woman is incompetent to determine
when, how, and under what circumstances
she will bear a child. No, the Government,
with its intimate understanding of her personal
circumstances, has proclaimed
that she must always carry a pregnancy to full term, at any cost.
In South Dakots's wisdom, childbearing
is always in a woman's - and her family's
- best interest.
I
wonder how,
exactly,
China's
one-child-per-couple
policy employing
forced
abortions,
is any
less morally repugnant?
The
Souh Dakota law disingenuously states
that a potential human
being, of the
sort composed of even a single cell carrying human DNA, is of
"equal worth" to the potential mother, who is - at
least theoretically, if not Constitutionally - an actual human
being. But this "equal worth" pretense
is nothing but an obvious and patronizing LIE. Because to demand that
a woman host a fetus for nine months, to require that
she bring a human into the world at all costs, this law is crystal
clear about whose worth trumps whose.
Now
about
that "Christianity," from whence ideas such as HB 1215 are
so deeply rooted, nurtured, and hatched, yet not even the National
Organization of Women, NARAL, the Democratic Party, nor Planned Parenthood
will
dare to simply address.
I
believe the American value of freedom is
worth great sacrifice. I believe that freedom cannot
co-exist with theocracy, the state where faith - which is by its very
definition irrational - trumps all reason and logic and sanity and
morality.
I see my beloved country moving closer to this every day. It is irrefutably,
undeniably anti-American.
These
bumbling theocrats in South Dakota (and those on the Supreme Court,
take your pick) don't even have it straight. Scriptures say
absolutely nothing about
abortion, although
Moses,
Jesus,
and Paul
et al. certainly had
ample opportunity to condemn it. But more importantly,
the Bible explicitly endorses the view that:
(1)
"life" begins at "breath," not
conception.
(2)
a fetus is not a human being. And,
(3)
the life of a mother is of far greater value than any fetus.
(See,
e.g., Genesis 2:7, and
Exodus 21:22-25.)
It
might prove enlightening if those who would enthusiastically embrace
so great an evil as HB 1215 would actually
read
such texts. But I am not very optimistic about that.
Despite all of this, some legislators in South Dakota have voted
for coat hangers. That's
why I'm sending them.
*
* * * *
